While some flaws remain, the many advantages of virtual courts mean they should become a part of how cases are heard when normalcy returns, writes Pravin Anand. The
By Arpita Kulshrestha. Amidst the widespread awareness for protecting inventions and securing robust patents, it is pertinent that a Patent Applicant is also aware that the rejection of
By Ritika Ahuja and Jasbir Singh. Artificial Intelligence, a fuel to almost every industry today, has shown a paradigm shift in technology over a period of time and
By Vaishali Mittal and Siddhanth Chamola. The IP litigation landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade with businesses becoming more technology-driven and technology-dependent than ever before. Innovation
By Nupur Maithani. Stem cells offer hope as a promising treatment option for various diseases and are the future of medicine. Embryonic stem cells, have been at the
By Tusha Malhotra and Pankhuri Malik. In 2018, in the case of Swapnil Tripathi v Supreme Court of India, the Supreme Court of India had advised that it was
Mr. Pravin Anand and Ridhie Bajaj argue in favour of fixed time slots for arguments and for leading evidence in IP litigation before Indian Courts. The Commercial Courts Act 2015 has reduced the life
Tusha Malhotra and Ashutosh Upadhyay, clarify the dubeity around the observation made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the decision of Alloys Wobben vs. Yogesh Mehra,
Due to the unprecedented circumstances following the COVID-19 pandemic, many businesses have faced disruption. In this context, ET NOW invited our Senior Partner, Safir Anand, to share his
Pravin Anand and Ashutosh Upadhyaya share the new ways developed by the Indian judiciary to administer justice in current pandemic situation while stressing that courts must adopt “time-bound”
